Legal Opinion

Arnold's License

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1906No. Appeal, No. 19PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 19, March T., 1906, by W. O. Rishel, from order of Q. S. Cumberland Co., refusing rule to revoke a liquor license In re License of M. L. Arnold. Before Petition for rule to revoke a liquor license. Before Sadler, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was refusal to grant the rule.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is- an appeal of W. O. Rishel and others from the decree of the court of quarter sessions of Cumberland county refusing to grant a rule on M. L. Arnold to show cause why his license should not be revoked.

The petition set forth quite strong reasons, at least sufficient to require the granting of a rule, and an investigation of the question of whether or not the licensee had violated the law by selling intoxicating liquors under a license granted to him by said court, at two places other than the house for which the license was granted.

We are met at the threshold of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. In re License to CarlsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Stewart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Appeals of MeenanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Commonwealth v. Joseph Kohnle Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnston's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API