Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The question presented is whether N. A. Landt, generating-station manager of the defendant corporation, was a “managing agent” or “superintendent” of the corporation within the meaning of sec. 262.09 (3), Stats., upon whom a notice of injury as provided in sec. 330.19 (5) might properly have been served.

Sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., in part provides:

“No action to recover damages for an injury to the person shall be maintained unless, within two years after the happening of the event causing such damages, notice in writing, signed by the party damaged, his agent or attorney, shall be served upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. AshauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Archer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Keske v. Square D Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Richards v. First Union Securities, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Richards v. First Union Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API