Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. Hafford

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 4, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] Michael Hafford appeals from the judgment of the District Court (Fort Kent, Daigle, J.) concluding that the Department of Human Services (DHS) is entitled to recover a judgment for the back child support that had accrued prior to the time the mother began receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), the predecessor program to Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF).1 Notwithstanding the mother’s affidavit that she had no wish to collect the pre-AFDC back support, the District Court found that, pursuant to 19-A M.R.S.A. §§ 2301 and 1606 (1998),2 Hafford owed DHS $17,580.34.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Department of Human Services v. SabattusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Jack v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Adam Mushero, Etc. v. H. Rollin Ives, Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Young v. LeifesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API