Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Sullivan

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 14, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00154Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION LIONEL GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 2:22-CV-154-PPS-APR KATHLEEN SULLIVAN, and JUDITH MASSA, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Lionel Gibson, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). [DE 6.] “Altering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has been a manifest error of law or fact.” Harrington v. City of Chicago,

433 F.3d 542, 546

(7th Cir. 2006). Gibson presents six arguments, but none of them warrant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API