Gibson v. Sullivan
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION LIONEL GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 2:22-CV-154-PPS-APR KATHLEEN SULLIVAN, and JUDITH MASSA, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Lionel Gibson, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). [DE 6.] “Altering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has been a manifest error of law or fact.” Harrington v. City of Chicago,
433 F.3d 542, 546
(7th Cir. 2006). Gibson presents six arguments, but none of them warrant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.