Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Maine

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2011No. DA 10-0329Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Rice

¶48 I concur in affirming the District Court but dissent from the Court’s reasoning, particularly, the creation of the expansive right to challenge prior judgments. The Court’s decision authorizes collateral attacks upon prior convictions on virtually limitless grounds, substantially expanding our jurisprudence which permitted challenges based upon asserted violations of the right to counsel. Now, whenever a prior conviction is to serve as a sentencing enhancement, any challenge which asserts a constitutionally based defect in the prior conviction may be raised in the midst of the criminal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API