Legal Opinion

Umar v. New York State Narcotic Addiction Control Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, without costs, and the respondent commis-' sion’s determination annulled in a memorandum. Memorandum: The order appealed from should be reversed, without costs, and the respondent’s determination suspending the petitioner for 15 days for insubordination annulled, on the ground that in the present context the respondent’s regulation that its male personnel “ shall not allow their hair to grow to an undue length (italics supplied) is so vague and uncertain as to offend against constitutional demands of due process. (See, e.g., Ashton v. Ken*733tucky, 384 U. S. 195, 200; Giaccio v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Ashton v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Robert Richards, Jr., a Minor by His Father and Next Friend Robert Richards v. Roger Thurston, as Principal of Marlboro High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. Richards Ex Rel. Richards v. ThurstonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connors v. CrabbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API