Newberry v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fooeeman, Justice.
This appeal was taken from the order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion for new trial. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the trial court’s order.
The motion for new trial was based upon the sole ground that the prosecuting attorney failed to disclose information in his “possession” which would have greatly assisted the defendant in preparing a defense. No specific allegations of fact were contained in the motion, but an affidavit atached to the motion was made a part of the motion. The gist of the affidavit by Gary Fultz was that he was an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Roath v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Murchison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Vasquez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Thomas v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.