Chris McGee et al. v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION CHRIS MCGEE et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. 4:26-cv-00243-O § ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., et al., § § Defendants. § § § OPINION & ORDER Before the Court are Defendants Robert F. Kennedy Jr. et al (the “Government”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 29), Plaintiffs’ Response (ECF No. 40), and the Government’s Reply (ECF No. 47). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No 29). All other pending Motions are DENIED as moot (ECF Nos. 27, 36, 37).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.