Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Health Clubs of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State ex rel. Austin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 18, 1980No. Nos. NN-46, NN-426, MM-364, MM-365 and NN-349Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge

I concur with the majority’s opinion affirming the orders of the trial court, except the affirmance of those orders which permanently enjoined the operation of defendants’ business as a public nuisance and found defendants guilty .of indirect criminal contempt. As to the former order, the court entered a permanent injunction after default had been entered. On appeal, defendants challenge the lower court’s finding that the business of Health Clubs constituted a nuisance and could not be operated as a legitimate business without committing certain acts of lewdness, i. e., masturbation for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Moore v. City Dry Cleaners LaundrySupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Florio v. State Ex Rel. EppersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API