Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roberts

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2003No. 2002-SC-0691-DG, 2002-SC-0326-DGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

We have considered these two appeals together because they concern a principal issue that is common to both cases. That issue involves the foundation requirements for admission of a breath alcohol test. The question also involves how service records are to be presented in a case concerning verification of a self-calibrated instrument.

In Commonwealth v. Roberts, 122 S.W.3d 524, 2003 WL 22971136 (2003), the Commonwealth appeals from a decision of the Court of Appeals denying its motion for discretionary review. The case involves an opinion of the Adair circuit court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WirthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Prater v. Cabinet for Human ResourcesKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Owens v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  4. Marcum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  5. Oldfield v. OldfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. WaltherKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hadaway v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
  4. Jonathon Taylor v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  5. Lewis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API