Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Casualty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
In this action for contribution under a coinsurance clause prompt notice of the accident to defendant insurance company was of vital importance to it, since its liability could arise only if the truck was being operated with the permission of its insured, and prompt investigation of that phase was essential for its protection in view of the borderline situation here claimed of implied permission arising from a course of conduct. While the delay here may not be held fatal as a matter of law, as would be true in the case of an insured’s failure to give due notice directly to his own insurance…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Di Cesare & Monaco Concrete Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Central Sur. & I. Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Meritplan Ins. Co. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Standard Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.