Legal Opinion

Rhead v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2001No. 24983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

Douglas and Raeola Rhead (Rheads) appeal the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Hartford Insurance Company. The district court determined that the Rheads did not have an insurable interest in property that was destroyed. The decision of the district court is vacated.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Cathy and Fred Afraid of Bear (Afraid of Bears) purchased a house located on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation in 1969 where they resided until 1984 when they moved to South Dakota. The Rheads agreed to purchase the house from the Afraid of Bears…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HoisingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kootenai Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PrestwichIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Basic American, Inc. v. ShatilaIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffith v. CLEAR LAKES TROUT CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hei v. HolzerIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Neustadt v. ColafranceschiIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Dorsey v. DorseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Bettwieser v. BettwieserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API