Legal Opinion

Criss v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1932No. 21098. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

On October 13, 1928, William Criss, an employee of plaintiff in error, Swift & Co., sustained an accidental injury that arose out of and in the course of his employment and which resulted in his death on that date. Defendant in error, Eva Criss, claiming to be the widow of William Criss, filed an application for compensation with the Industrial Commission. After a hearing the arbitrator filed his decision, by which he found that defendant in error was not entitled to compensation as widow of the deceased employee because the evidence did not establish that she had been legally married to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Wilson v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Dudley v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Brennen v. Brennen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1952
  3. Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In the Matter of the Estate of Joaquin C. Leon GuerreroSuperior Court of Guam · 2022
  5. SALVADOR-FUENTESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API