Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Gant

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 20, 2006No. 2 CA-CR 2000-0430Published

1DissentEspinosa, Judge

¶22 I respectfully dissent. The majority arrives at its conclusion by seizing on dicta in State v. Dean, 206 Adz. 158, ¶ 34, 76 P.3d 429, 437 (2003), to, in essence, single-handedly discard the bright-line rule set forth in New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 460, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981), and followed in scores of eases since, including those in Arizona such as State v. Hein, 138 Ariz. 360, 365, 674 P.2d 1358, 1363 (1983); State v. Hanna, 173 Ariz. 30, 32, 839 P.2d 450, 452 (App.1992); State v. Hersch, 135 Ariz. 528, 531, 662 P.2d 1035, 1038 (App.1982); and Dean itself, 206…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API