Saldona v. State

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Saldona appeals his conviction of the offense of harassing phone calls (OCGA § 16-11-39 (4)). Held:

1. The first enumeration of error maintains that the evidence is not sufficient to authorize defendant’s conviction because there is evidence of only one telephone call in which defendant threatened the victim. Defendant’s argument is predicated on an incorrect reading of Sarver v. State, 206 Ga. App. 459 (2) (426 SE2d 48) which notes that the statute provides alternative and separate ways by which the crime may be committed. In the case sub judice, the…