Legal Opinion

State Bank Building Co. v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. A. Van Wagenen, Judge. The plaintiff is acting as a corporation. This is an action at law to recover a balance claimed to be due from the defendant upon a subscription of ten thousand dollars to the capital stock of the said corporation. There was a trial before the court without a jury, and a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

1 I. The original petition in the case was filed on the thirteenth day of October, 1891. It was attacked by a motion to strike parts of the petition, and to compel the plaintiff to make the pleading more specific. The motion was sustained in part, and the plaintiff amended the petition. The defendant then demurred to the petition as amended, and the plaintiff again amended its petition, and the defendant amended his demurrer. Thereupon the plaintiff filed the third amendment to its petition, and the defendant filed an amended and substituted demurrer to the petition upon some seventeen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chubb v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Methodist Episcopal Union Church v. . PickettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. The Buffalo and Allegany Railroad Company v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Osgood & Moss v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lex v. Selway Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Miller v. Hawkeye Gold Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Sherwood v. Greater Mammoth Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Graebner v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State Ex Rel. Havner v. Associated Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API