Legal Opinion

Rotunno v. City of Rochester

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eugene W. Bergin, J.

The plaintiffs who are police officers of the City of Rochester, have brought the action seeking a declaratory judgment and ask in their complaint that section 128 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and section 100.1 of the New York State Liquor Authority Regulations (9 NYCRR) be declared unconstitutional and void. They further seek in their complaint a judgment permanently enjoining the City of Rochester from enforcing the regulation and the statute.

The matter comes before this court by order to show cause directed against the City of Rochester in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 303 West 42nd Street Corp. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State Division of Human Rights v. Genesee HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Rosica v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API