Legal Opinion

Cox v. Kirkwood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1914No. 3609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Cherokee County; J. E. Parks, Judge. Action by J. E. Cox against J. T. Kirkwood and twelve others. Judgment was for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

The plaintiff in error commenced this action against J. T. Kirkwood and twelve others to recover $675, balance due on a promissory note dated November 4, 1908, due November 1, 1909, payable to the order of Edward T. Philpot, or bearer, alleging that he purchased said note prior to maturity for value and in due course of business, and that he was the legal holder thereof, and that the same was past due and unpaid, and praying for judgment. The defendants filed an amended answer in which they denied execution of the note, and also denied that they had made any payment on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. KimererSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Young v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API