Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Diamond

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1924No. Appeal, No. 188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiffs agreed to sell to defendant certain Prussian blue, which was to be equal to a sample shown, and was to be delivered and paid for in installments. Alleging that the quality was grossly defective, defendant refused to receive the first shipment, and rescinded the contract. He also rejected all later tenders, whereupon this suit was brought to recover the difference between the contract and market prices at the times and place of delivery.

At the trial, plaintiffs admitted that the blue first sent was inferior to the sample, and for this reason they had…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Tube & Stamping Co. v. Erie Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Benedict v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. F. A. D. Andrea, Inc. v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  4. Hickman, Williams & Co. v. Wayne Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Dodge v. F. A. D. Andrea, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API