Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harvey v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1996No. S95G1743Published

1DissentSears, Justice

Because I conclude that State v. Stringer1 requires this Court to hold that Harvey’s arrest pursuant to an invalid bench warrant constituted an arrest without probable cause, and because the good-faith exception to the federal exclusionary rule is not applicable in this state, I dissent to the majority’s holding that the Court of Appeals correctly affirmed the trial court’s denial of Harvey’s motion to suppress.

1. In Stringer, Stringer was arrested pursuant to a 21-month-old state-court bench warrant for two misdemeanor shoplifting charges. During custodial interrogation, Stringer implicated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  3. State v. StringerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. Burnham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API