Legal Opinion

Haug v. Third National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Wayne. (Beilly, J.) Bill to set aside .certain conveyances as fraudulent. Complainant appeals. The, facts are stated in tbe opinion, and in the former reports of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This case has been before this Court on three former occasions. Haug v. Bank, 77 Mich. 474; Third National Bank v. Circuit Judge, 81 Id. 438; Third National Bank v. Haug, 82 Id. 607. Complainant has now amended his bill, making his assignor a party, and prays that he be compelled to perfect complainant’s title by proper conveyances, and that the assignment of the land contract, the real-estate, mortgage, and the bills of sale of the vessels, be declared fraudulent and void, as against complainant and the creditors of the assignor.

How. Stat. §§ 6190, 6193, apply to mortgages or transfers of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cutler v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Haug v. Third National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API