Legal Opinion

Wynn v. Maddox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1924No. 15551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. An action on a forthcoming bond in a claim case may be brought in the name of the levying officer or of the plaintiff in fi. fa. When the suit is brought in the name of the levying officer for the use of the plaintiff in fi. fa., the officer is only a formal party, without interest in the subject-matter, the plaintiff in fi. fa. being the real party. Gordon v. McCauley, 73 Ga. 667; Martin v. Lamb, 77 Ga. 252 (2); Wortsman v. Wade, 77 Ga. 651 (4 Am. St. Rep. 102). The plaintiff in fi. fa. presumably institutes the action, and may bring it in either of the forms indicated above, without the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martin v. Lamb & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Harrison v. McHenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  3. Hillyer v. PearsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Williams v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Wortsman v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lightner v. BelkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Sligh v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Roper v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API