Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1922PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

Appellant was convicted of statutory rape committed on the person of Pansy Connor, a minor female. From the judgment of conviction and an order denying a motion for a new trial this appeal is taken. There are many specifications of error, of which we deem it necessary to mention only a few.

Appellant contends that the court erred in permitting the witness Mrs. Lulu Smith to testify, over his objection, to a statement made by the prosecutrix.

“In a prosecution for rape, the state may prove by the prosecutrix and other witnesses that she made complaint soon after the commission of the alleged…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. MaguireIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. BondIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. FlemingIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. SmailesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. PruettIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. LinebargerIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API