Legal Opinion

Benaglia v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 5, 1937No. Docket No. 87638PublishedCited by 24 opinions

To a taxpayer employee who, solely for the convenience of his employer and as a necessary incident of the proper performance of his duty, receives food and lodging from the employer, the value thereof is not taxable income.

1Opinion of the Court

*839OPINION.

Sternhagen :

The Commissioner has added $7,845 each year to the petitioner’s gross income as “compensation received from Hawaiian Hotels, Ltd.”, holding- that this is “the fair market value of rooms and meals furnished by the employer.” In the deficiency notice he cites article 52 [53], Regulations 77, and holds inapplicable Jones v. United States, 60 Ct. Cls. 552; I. T. 2232; G. C. M. 14710; and G. C. M. 14836. The deficiency notice seems to hold that the rooms and meals were not in fact supplied “merely as a convenience to the hotels” of the employer..

From the evidence, there remains…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Coombs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Anderson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. Heyward v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. Diamond v. SturrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Everett and Mary C. DoakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API