Legal Opinion
Trs. of Ind. Univ. v. Prosecutor of Marion Cnty. Ind.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 19, 2018No. 1:16–cv–01289–JMS–DMLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge
This case is the latest in a series of challenges to various statutory provisions that were enacted as part of House Enrolled Act 1337. This Act codified a number of abortion-related provisions, some civil and some criminal. In this action, Plaintiffs the Trustees of Indiana University, Fred Cate, Dr. Bruce Lamb, and Dr. Debomoy Lahiri (collectively "IU") challenge a provision that criminalizes the acquisition, receipt, sale, and transfer of aborted fetal tissue. IU moves for summary judgment, arguing that the provision violates the United States Constitution, based on five different…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trustees of Indiana University v. Terry CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Trustees of Indiana University v. Terry CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Trustees of Indiana University v. Terry CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Trustees of Indiana University v. Terry CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019