Union Iron Works Co. v. Union Naval Stores Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. John T. Lackland. Action by tbe Union Iron Works Oo. against the Union Naval Stores Company. Judgment for nonsuit, and plaintiffs appeals. That the agreement made by the corporation might be had at an informal meeting see. — Jordan 67 Ala. 139; Adams Mach. Go. v. Int.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. John T. Lackland. Action by tbe Union Iron Works Oo. against the Union Naval Stores Company. Judgment for nonsuit, and plaintiffs appeals. That the agreement made by the corporation might be had at an informal meeting see. — Jordan 67 Ala. 139; Adams Mach. Go. v. Int. B. <& L. Assn., 119 Ala. 139, 24 So. 857. The statute only changes the common law rule in cases where subsequent purchasers for a Valuable consideration, subsequent mortgagees and judgment creditors acquire title without notice of the condition. — Wood v. Holley Mfg. Go., 100…
1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.
— This is an action in trover to recover damages for the alleged conversion by the defendants of certain property described in the complaint. The cause was tried on the plea of the general issue. Many exceptions during the progress of the trial were reserved by the plaintiffs to the rulings of the court on the introduction of evidence. On the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ evidence, the court on motion of the defendants excluded all of the evidence hy the plaintiffs, on the ground that the plaintiffs had failed to make out a prima facie case, whereupon plaintiffs took a nonsuit.
*650The plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jordan & Co. v. Collins & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tiner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Neibert v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Weaver v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Gilbreath v. CopelandAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Tiner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960