Legal Opinion
State v. Marsh
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 19, 2001No. 19403-5-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 P.3d 1127 (2001)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Charles Ernest MARSH, Appellant.
No. 19403-5-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.
June 19, 2001.
Paul J. Wasson, Spokane, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Pros. Attys., Spokane, for Respondent.
OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART
SCHULTHEIS, J.
Charles Marsh was convicted of first degree rape of a child. On appeal he presents a constitutional challenge to the court's disqualification of potential jurors who could not speak English. In particular, he contends non-hearing jurors are entitled to interpreters,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carter v. Jury Comm'n of Greene Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Xieng v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. VotavaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State Of Washington v. Sebastian GuajardoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Sebastian GuajardoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington, V Anthony R. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.