Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2015Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Eakin

I agree with the Majority and, the dissent of Chief Justice Saylor that Commonwealth v. Bell Tel. Co., 348 Pa. 161, 34 A.2d 531 (1943) (Bell III), controls the outcome of the instant appeals. Verizon Telephone Company of.Pennsylvania fails to, present a compelling reason to set aside the doctrine of stare decisis. See Majority Op., at 756-60. I further agree with the Majority’s conclusion that, in light of Bell III, Verizon’s gross receipts from the provision of private telephone lines1 and directory assistance services are taxable under § 1101(a)(2) of the Tax Code, 72 P.S. § 8101(a)(2).2…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API