Legal Opinion

King v. Stephens-Adamson Manfg. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 91, Calendar No. 35,910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff, while in the employ of the defendant manufacturing company as a rivet catcher, was injured, by being struck in the eye by a hot rivet on August 15, 1930. A report of compensable accident .was filed by that company on October 11th. His average weekly wage was stated to be $37.50. No agreement for compensation was entered into. The defendants filed a notice and application for adjustment of claim on December 31, 1930. A hearing was had before deputy commissioner McGregor on March 12, 1931, and adjourned by him to March 27th, when he made an award for compensation at $18 per week…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lotrich v. Life Printing & Publishing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API