Legal Opinion

Hart v. Hart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Injunction. Debtor and creditor. Judgment. Fraudulent conveyance. Attachments. Bill of exceptions. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Clark. Sumter county. At chambers.

Read the full summary

Injunction. Debtor and creditor. Judgment. Fraudulent conveyance. Attachments. Bill of exceptions. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Clark. Sumter county. At chambers. September 9th, 1874. It is only necessary to add to the facts stated in the decision that the ground on which the injunction was sought was that the consideration of the indebtedness to Samuel Hart was land and other property, which the complainant believed was used by the defendants in the purchase of certain lots in the city of Americus, upon which they erected a brick store; that in 1868 or 1869, the defendants…

1Opinion of the Court

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was a bill filed by the complainant against the defendants, praying for an injunction to restrain them from disposing of or conveying certain described property mentioned therein. The presiding judge, on hearing the application for the injunction, and considering the answers of defendants and *378the several affidavits filed by the respective parties, refused the injunction; whereupon, the complainant excepted. The defendants at the same time made a motion to remove an attachment which had been levied on the same property, under the provisions of the 3297th section of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Comer & Co. v. Coates & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Rogers v. E. M. Birdsall Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API