Legal Opinion

Blackford v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 15, 1875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The case is stated by Judge Anderson in his opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

By the 4th section of the act amending the charter of Lynchburg, passed December 8, 1866 (Acts 1866-’7, p. 460), jurisdiction is given to the court of Hustings for the said city, “not only within the corporate limits of said city, but also for the space of one mile without and around said city.” .On the 31st of July 1869, Thomas L. Johnson, S. W. Younger, and John T. *Smith, who were partners constituting the firm of Younger & Co., executed a deed of trust, conveying, with other property situated and being within the corporate limits of the city of Lynchburg, a lot of four acres of land lying…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boston & Co. v. C. & O. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  2. Burgess v. BelvinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Boston & Co. v. C. & O. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  3. Campbell & Co. v. Nonpareil F. B. & K. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  4. Burgess v. BelvinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API