Robbins v. Freeman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Judge.
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred by failing to find that defendants are required, pursuant to G.S. 15A-1354(b), to aggregate consecutive sentences for armed robbery committed prior to 1 October 1994 for purposes of determining parole eligibility. We agree.
In determining the effect of consecutive sentences, the Department of Correction must treat a defendant as if he had been committed for a single term. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1354(b) (1985). In such a case, the minimum term of imprisonment consists of the total of the minimum terms of the consecutive sentences. G.S.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. LeeperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vest v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Teasley v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Price v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. SurrattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.