Cassady v. Grimmelman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal, from Pottawattamie District Court. — -Walter I. SMITH, Judge. Special proceedings to subject D. E. H. Grimmelman’s interest in a certain judgment rendered in liis favor, as administrator, against the Union Pacific Railway, to the payment of a judgment against said Grimmelman. The trial court granted the relief prayed, and Grimmelman appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDejsmer, J.
The facts are not in dispute. On the first day of February, 1876, a co-parnership, doing business under the firm name of J. P. & J. N. Cassady, recovered judgment against D. E. IT. Grimmelman for something over-*697four hundred dollars in the circuit court of Pottawattamie county. In January of tlie year 1895, D. E. II. Grimmel-man, as administrator of the estate of W. R. Grimmelman, deceased, recovered judgment against the Union Pacific Railway Company in the sum of five thousand dollars for the death of said W. R. Grimmelman. That judgment was affirmed by this court. See 101 Iowa, 74. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Call v. HaggerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Haynes v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Weiser v. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Kelley v. MannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Grimmelman v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norris v. TrippSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Wooster v. BatemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Newgirg v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Williams v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Peters v. Snavely-AshtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.