Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 16, 1967No. Docket Nos. 3906-65, 3943-65Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Muedoce:, Judge:

The Commissioner in the deficiency notices stated that amortization under section 187 is not allowable with respect to the cost of the location contracts because they “are of such an indefinite character that no probable useful life can be determined.” The evidence shows the error of that reasoning.

The unrefuted testimony is that each written contract or lease was for a definite period of years stated in the contract, could be enforced at law by either party for those years but for those years only, and carried no provision for or promise of renewal. Also it is clear…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Seaboard Finance Company, Seaboard Finance Company, Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. United Benefit Life Insurance Company v. McCroryDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965
  3. George D. Patterson, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue v. The Birmingham News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API