Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. Holbert
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 25, 1914No. 3510PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from County Court,' Johnston County; Nick Wolfe, Judge. Action by A. B. Holbert, on written instrument for purchase price of stallion, against C. N. Rutherford. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
On July 15, 1911, plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment against the defendant for $300, with interest thereon at 6 per cent. per annum from May 17, 1910, in an action upon an instrument in writing, which reads as follows:
“Tishomingo, Okla. May 17, 1910. Seeing it necessary to improve the breed of our horses, we, the undersigned subscribers, hereby purchase and agree to pay the sum of $3,000.00 to A. B. Holbert for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilson v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Pickersgill v. LahensSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Elastic Tip Co. v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Powell v. United Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Smith v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Yeager v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Union Trust Co. v. Poor & Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.