Prouty v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*1073OPINION.
Seaweuo :
The issue in this proceeding is whether certain dividends received in 1927 and 1928 by the trustees of six trusts created by the petitioner are, under the circumstances detailed in our findings of fact, taxable to the petitioner.
In each of the three trusts, Nos. 1, 2, and 8, constituting the first set of trusts, the trust instruments provided' that the petitioner, “ Olive H. Prouty expressly reserves to herself the right and power from time to time to change, add to, alter, amend or cancel any or all of the provisions of this declaration of trust * *
Section 219 (g) of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Stetson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Lit v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Holmes v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Hormel v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932