Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Perkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 21, 2006No. 1041735PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

941 So.2d 242 (2006)

Ex parte Roy Edward PERKINS.

(In re State of Alabama

v.

Roy Edward Perkins).

1041735.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 2006.

William R. Montross, Jr., and Vanessa M. Buch, Atlanta, Georgia, for petitioner.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Henry M. Johnson, asst. atty. gen., for respondent the State.

William S. Donaldson, respondent circuit judge.

Chris Hargett, chief asst. district atty., Tuscaloosa, for Tuscaloosa County District Attorney's Office.

LYONS, Justice.

Roy Edward Perkins petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus. We deny the petition.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In 1994,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waldrop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Davis v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Ex Parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API