Legal Opinion

Petaccio v. New York Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1936No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

By stipulation of counsel the name of the plaintiff in this action of assumpsit was amended, before trial, to read “Dominick Petaccio.” It was brought to recover $15,148.17 as the proceeds of two contracts of life insurance which plaintiff alleged the defendant company had issued in 1928 to his father, John Petaccio, and in which plaintiff was named as the beneficiary.

The issuing of the policies described in the statement of claim (full copies of which were attached), the death of John Petaccio on July 14, 1933, and his relationship to plaintiff, were admitted by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ludwinska v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Stein v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Obartuch v. Security Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Amex Life Assurance Co. v. . Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Valant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Strawbridge v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  5. Alice Blair v. Berkshire Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API