Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Anne Arundel Medical Center

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 31, 2003No. 02-2000UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant, Ronald W. Parkinson, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Anne Arundel Medical Center (“AAMC”), and two of the center’s employees, Bonnie Poznanski and Cynthia Wilson (collectively, “appellees”), in his civil action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. The district court concluded that Parkinson did not establish that he was disabled as defined by the ADA, thus defeating his claim for failure to provide reasonable accommodation. The court also concluded that…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Peters v. JenneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Thomas E. Ballard v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Coulson v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. BRINK v. XE HOLDING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
  2. Brunson v. Prince George's County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  3. Dressel v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  4. Pate v. Medical Diagnostic Laboratories L.L.C.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. Smith v. McDonoughDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API