Parkinson v. Anne Arundel Medical Center
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, Ronald W. Parkinson, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Anne Arundel Medical Center (“AAMC”), and two of the center’s employees, Bonnie Poznanski and Cynthia Wilson (collectively, “appellees”), in his civil action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. The district court concluded that Parkinson did not establish that he was disabled as defined by the ADA, thus defeating his claim for failure to provide reasonable accommodation. The court also concluded that…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Peters v. JenneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Thomas E. Ballard v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Coulson v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- BRINK v. XE HOLDING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
- Brunson v. Prince George's County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Dressel v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Pate v. Medical Diagnostic Laboratories L.L.C.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Smith v. McDonoughDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.