Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'n v. Air Pollution Control Commission of the Colorado Department of Health
Colorado Court of Appeals
1DissentBerman, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
A presumption of regularity attaches to an administration’s regulation when it is acting within its statutory power and within the parameters of its organic legislation as here. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 91 S.Ct. 814, 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971). A reviewing court may reverse an administrative ruling only when there is no rational basis to the agency’s decision and it is not “reasonably related to a legitimate use of state authority.” Peshel v. Motor Vehicle Division, 43 Colo.App. 58, 602 P.2d 875 (1979); see Overton Park, supra. This is not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State of Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Variance BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Air Pollution Control Commission v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.