Legal Opinion

Fitz-Gerald v. Rich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs motion seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendant B.M.W. Financial Services, N. A., Inc. (BMW). Plaintiff, a passenger in the back seat of an automobile driven by defendant Mark A. Santomassino, was injured when Santomassino allegedly swerved to avoid a deer and lost control of the automobile. The court properly refused to determine that BMW is vicariously liable as a matter of law, as the owner of the vehicle leased to *1018Santomassino (see, Vehicle and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Laylon v. ShaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Davis v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mazzarella v. McVeighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. SHAW, THEODORE J. v. ROSHA ENTERPRISES, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Shaw v. Rosha Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Shaw v. Rosha Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API