Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Herald E. Stringer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1956No. 14659PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Stringer, an Anchorage attorney, has been suspended from practice for a period of 120 days pursuant to an order made in disciplinary proceedings in the Third Division (Anchorage) of the District Court for the Territory of Alaska. He appeals.

The information (not strictly a criminal one) charged violations by Stringer of his obligations as a lawyer in connection with his fee arrangements with a client who was a taxi driver. The client has been arrested at Anchorage on a charge of hauling persons for prostitution. The client stood in jeopardy of possible criminal…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. El Fenix De Puerto Rico v. the M/Y JohannyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API