Legal Opinion

Eidem v. Eidem

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 10, 2019No. 19-1417Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-1417 Eidem v. Eidem UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Mathie v. FriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Felix Blondin v. Marthe DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Yossi Gitter, in the Matter of Eden Moshe Gitter: Infant Under the Age of 16 v. Miriam GitterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Felix Blondin v. Marthe DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API