Legal Opinion

Weightman v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 15, 1819PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

delivered the opiniop of the Court. The suit below was instituted on a promissory note by the defendant in error. Although it is, in fact, an indorsed note, and so declared on ; yet it is admitted to have originated in a negociation between the maker and indorser, and whatever defence would be good as against the promisee, is admitted to be maintainable against this indorser, the indorser standing only on the ground of a security or ordinary collateral undertaker, to the maker. The defence set up is the statute of frauds, not Under the supposition that a promissory note is a contract within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Keating v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1799

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Walling v. AmidonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. (HC) Brown v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Israel v. CarterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PS) McGill El Bey v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API