State v. McLemore
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} This appeal is brought by the state pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 and Crim.R. 12(K) from a judgment of the trial court that granted defendant, Tyler McLemore’s, motion to suppress the evidence.
{¶ 2} In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, an appellate court must accept the trial court’s findings of fact if they are supported by competent, credible evidence in the record. Accepting those facts as true, the court of appeals then independently determines, as a matter of law without deference to the trial court’s conclusion, whether those facts…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. MayberryOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. LevengoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.