Legal Opinion

Kerley v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

The Federal Courts have final authority in matters of removal under 28 U. S. O. A., sec. II; U. S. Constitution, Article III, sec. 2; Road Improvement District v. St. Louis S. W. R. Co., 257 U. S., 547, 66 L. Ed., 364; N. C. Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co., 282 F., 837, 33 A. L. R., 626. When a petition for removal is filed in the State Court and denied, the movant may pursue either of two courses : He may file his record in the" Federal Court, subject to the plaintiff’s right to make a motion to remand; Judicial Code, see. 28 (28 U. S. C. A., sec. 71); Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WhiteakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carden v. Owle Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API