Kerley v. Standard Oil Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
The Federal Courts have final authority in matters of removal under 28 U. S. O. A., sec. II; U. S. Constitution, Article III, sec. 2; Road Improvement District v. St. Louis S. W. R. Co., 257 U. S., 547, 66 L. Ed., 364; N. C. Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co., 282 F., 837, 33 A. L. R., 626. When a petition for removal is filed in the State Court and denied, the movant may pursue either of two courses : He may file his record in the" Federal Court, subject to the plaintiff’s right to make a motion to remand; Judicial Code, see. 28 (28 U. S. C. A., sec. 71); Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WhiteakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carden v. Owle Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012