Legal Opinion

Prindiville v. Johnson & Higgins

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 2, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, V. C.

This is a stockholders) bill, alleging two causes of action; to compel the defendant corporation to declare and pay dividends, and to restrain the directors from paying themselves excessive salaries.

Johnson & Higgins was incorporated in 1899, under “An act concerning corporations” (Rev. 1896), with an authorized capital stock of $500,000—half preferred and half common. The preferred stock is eight per cent., non-cumulative, dividend bearing, with priority over the common,, in dividends, and in the capital upon dissolution. The authorized capital stock has been increased to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Spring Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Arnot v. . Pittston and Elmira Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Hill v. Warner, Berman & Spitz, PANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Tri-Continental Financial Corporation v. Tropical Marine Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Lawson v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1930
  5. Lawson v. Household Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API