Walker v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JUNELL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery. Appellant contends that, because the record does not contain the requested transcription of the court reporter’s notes, he is entitled to a new trial. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that the judicially created statement of the proceedings included in the record is not an adequate substitute for a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, but Appellant’s lack of diligence in seeking to obtain the requested statement of facts 1 precludes our reversing for a new trial. We affirm.
Appellant was indicted for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Guillory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Timmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Shead v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Aguirre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
- Emerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.