Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1982No. A14-81-505-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery. Appellant contends that, because the record does not contain the requested transcription of the court reporter’s notes, he is entitled to a new trial. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that the judicially created statement of the proceedings included in the record is not an adequate substitute for a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, but Appellant’s lack of diligence in seeking to obtain the requested statement of facts 1 precludes our reversing for a new trial. We affirm.

Appellant was indicted for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Guillory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Timmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Shead v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  3. Aguirre v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  4. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  5. Emerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API