United States v. Figueroa
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Edwin Figueroa appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Judge), following a jury trial, convicting him of unlawful possession of a firearm. 1 At trial, the district court ruled that the defendant’s counsel could not cross-examine a government witness about his swastika tattoos. We conclude that this restriction on the scope of cross-examination was a violation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. We affirm the conviction, however, because we also conclude that the error was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James and MallayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Taizhou Zhongneng Import & Export Co. v. KoutsobinasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.