Legal Opinion

United States v. Figueroa

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 18, 2008No. 06-1595-crPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACK, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Edwin Figueroa appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Judge), following a jury trial, convicting him of unlawful possession of a firearm. 1 At trial, the district court ruled that the defendant’s counsel could not cross-examine a government witness about his swastika tattoos. We conclude that this restriction on the scope of cross-examination was a violation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. We affirm the conviction, however, because we also conclude that the error was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. James and MallayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Taizhou Zhongneng Import & Export Co. v. KoutsobinasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API