Legal Opinion
Carmack v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 17, 1929No. A-6716PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Muskogee county on a charge of an assault with a danger ous weapon, and his punishment fixed at a term of two years in the state penitentiary.
The theory of the state, as shown by the statement of the county attorney, appears on page 18 of the case-made, and is as follows:
“It is the theory of the state that the defendant, S. R. Carmack and Paul Davis' were acting jointly and together in the various transactions which happened at the Maple rooms, the Antlers rooms and the Tulsa Hotel on the night of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ShawleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
- Bouyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.